Oppenheimer gets a lot of shit these days for the whole “oh I created this city-destroying bomb but I feel so bad about how it was used” etc etc, and people clowning on him for that, but I wonder how a lot of people on this site who call it a black and white moral choice would react if they were in that same situation, which is to say if their country was at war against the Nazis, and where the big fear was iirc that they were also working on developing the bomb.
Like, okay, nuclear bombs are bad, obviously, but imagine you’re some dude in the 40s, you are a scientist rather than a politician or military strategist, you have limited information but your country is in the middle of a catastrophic global war with a massive fascist alliance the like of which the world has never seen. The physics community has just solved the equations and realised that this weapon might be possible, and that it is powerful enough to change the course of warfare forever, and the scientists who had escaped evil fascist alliance are telling you “look, the scientists who discovered this was possible were German, the Nazis are probably working on this and they might be further ahead than we are”.
So the government comes to you and says, “we need to try and develop this first, because if not then they will use it to wipe us all out.” And you have no reason to believe that’s not true, because the science did come from the area of the Evil Fascist Alliance, and your country, your community and friends and loved ones, are already engaged in fighting the catastrophic world-ending war and there have been no holds barred.
I don’t know, a lot of people manifest pretty strong principles in hindsight looking at the actual circumstances of the bomb’s use by the US military, but given the sort of uses of violence I see advocated here for fighting back against fascists over much lower stakes than “literally World War II” (not judging whether that is correct or not, just observing), I am fairly sure that a large chunk of the people making snarky jokes about Oppenheimer would have built the bomb and handed it over to the US on the spot, perhaps feeling misgivings at the time but feeling it is necessary, then only coming to feel truly bad about it after the fact, following, like… the exact trajectory that I believe Oppenheimer did.
Not for nothing, but there are a lot of people on this website who love saying “tee-hee punch a Nazi!” right up to the point where you ask them to have an ounce of perspective on a team of scientists largely comprised of leftist Jewish refugees who literally fled the Holocaust (or in Oppenheimer’s case, the first-generation son of German Jewish immigrants who still had family in Germany when Hitler came to power), and then suddenly it’s like “What outlook could have possibly motivated these people to work on something so terrible?”
Like, I am not defending every choice these guys made. Hell, we know for a fact that many of them were filled with regret and would have done things differently in hindsight. But jfc learn to apply some goddamn context, and don’t talk about punching Nazis if you can’t understand why a bunch of people whose families were literally annihilated by the OG Nazis might have been preoccupied with developing this weapon first.